The Ugliest Flies

Published Nov 16th 2007

Commercial flies can be fairly good - sometimes. This bunch is about as bad as they come.


Blue Charm? - Not exactly charming...
Blue Charm?
Jack Scott!? - The proper name is Jock Scott, but this fly is neither a Jack nor a Jock.
Jack Scott!?
Silver Doctor? - This fly was mounted over the text Silver Doctor. It could be a Thunder and Lightning - with a LOT of very good will.
Silver Doctor?
Thunder and Lightning? - This must be the fly misplaced at birth, but even though the colors could indicate a Silver Doctor the fly is far from.
Thunder and Lightning?
I have just received the ugliest flies I have ever seen in my life. And no, don't worry they weren't from a potential GFF contributor or a well meaning friend, but commercially tied. They just confirmed what I have always said: home tied flies are best.

"My God, you're ugly!"
These famous words are John Cleese's and are uttered with the deepest contempt in a scene in Fawlty Towers where he eyes a nurse when waking up in a hospital after yet another of those hilarious but painfully embarrassing incidents - this one involving some Germans.

The words ran into my mind when I first saw these flies. I received them as a small compensation for a delayed reel I have been trying to acquire. (Ordered and paid months ago, never heard a word, and the reel appears to not even having been ordered yet. But that's a whole other story).
The flies are packed in a small plastic box. Four of them, labeled Laxflugor (salmon flies in Swedish) with each pattern named in the bottom: Blue Charm, Thunder & Lightning, Jack Scott (sic!) and Silver Doctor. Apart from Jack most likely being Jock, the names are of salmon flies alright, and the flies do to some extent resemble salmon flies. But just barely. And if you were to accept the fact that these flies were actually the salmon flies whose names are printed on the cardboard, the manufacturers have switched a couple of them around - just to kick you off balance again.

The precise words
Basil Fawlty: My God, you're ugly, aren't you?
Nurse: I'll... I'll get the doctor.
Basil Fawlty: It's a plastic surgeon you need, not a doctor.

Source: IMDB
Sowing thread
Each fly is a hair wing fly tied on a double hook. Salmon hooks were often referred to as "irons" back when such flies were full dressed, and these hooks are indeed irons. Huge eyes and heavy wire. Now, don't get me wrong. I like heavy hooks, and a fly tied on a heavy double hook can be a beauty, but not in this case. The hooks look clumsy and cheap.
That might of course be because the flies are extremely badly tied and very clumsy in all respects.
I will only just mention a few of their flaws, and let you judge the rest from the pictures.
The thread used is what appears to be sowing thread. Very rough and thick. As most fly tiers know that leads to thick bodied flies with large heads, which is exactly what we have here. And to make it worse the heads aren't varnished, so two of them have already started to unravel, and they are all bound to fall apart before even touching water.

About the ugliest flies I have seen.

The hair used for the flies is crude and curly, uneven and either broken or maybe even trimmed on one of the flies. The colors may have some resemblance with the colors from the original patterns, but not enough for it to shine through.
The bodies are worse and tags and tails are so oddly tied and positioned, that it's obvious that no one who ever saw a well (or just correctly) tied fly were involved in the process here. Nothing is symmetrical, in line or even correctly placed. One tinsel tag goes in between the two legs of the double hook, just to mention one oddity.
I have seen quite a few commercially tied flies in my times. Only very few are beautiful, a few more are just well tied but most are plain ordinary bordering on the ugly or clumsy. But none I have seen even get close to these. They take the prize.

I checked out these flies a bit closer, and the package is about 8 Euros or some 10 US$. This must be considered pure robbery! I will give each of these flies a lifespan of about 5-10 minutes on a two hand rod before the heads come unravelled - the two that aren't already, that is. After that the flies will probably just disintegrate. I wouldn't even strip off the materials and use the hooks. I can get about 8-12 good double hooks for that price.

These flies have once again confirmed why I tie my own flies: to get a good quality. I do not demand display quality flies, and God knows that most of my own flies are uneven and sometimes a bit out of proportion. I have never tied a full dressed salmon fly and small dry flies is also one of my weak spots. But I at least try to use the right materials, the right patterns and the right tying methods. And I try to finish my flies properly so that they can endure a little fishing.
Most home made flies I see are like that. Many are better and a few are world class. But all are orders of a magnitude better than these four salmon flies, which would go into my cabinet of horrors - if I had one.

User comments
From: Milo Bookout  Link
Submitted March 13th 2010

Could it be that the world of modern art has finally reached the world of fly tying? These flies would hardly fall in the category of impressionist. The quality is certainly the most distressing trait, for while they might catch a fish (singular), it would have to be done quickly before they came apart.


From: michael j duffalo · amandareed79·at·  Link
Submitted November 16th 2009

at first glance i did beleive these flies to be a bit intriguing, ( may be my bad taste or the artist in me) after further inspection they do seee a bit hastily made and crude. (kinda like an oil painting) you gotta give them about fifteen feet to see the beauty, ha ha!!!

From: Rich Johnson · purnellphoto·at·  Link
Submitted March 20th 2009

Opps - now that I'm on the home page I see where the Blue Charm fly came from.
I think the flies and names are correct, just not properly labeled.
Clockwise from then top left.
Jock Scott/Blue Charm/Silver Doctor/ Thunder & Lightning
All the best

From: andrew · fisherman·at·  Link
Submitted February 4th 2009

Dear Martin, in fact fishes are most important ,even i you put them to the water.Most important is biting and draging. We still hunters. Best wishes

From: Andreas · niinmita·at·  Link
Submitted January 23rd 2009

Fladen is know for the bad quality on all of the stuff they sell, but those flyes cost approximately 4 Euros here in Sweden, but regardless of the price i can't recommend anything from Fladen. Believe me, I worked at a place that sold Fladen and nothing worked as i should. needless to say that we didn't sell much :D

From: Ron · rntshy·at·  Link
Submitted January 21st 2009

My buddy tied his first fly after consuming multiple beers in Alaska. A fugly orange wooly bugger bead chain eyed knot of fur and tinsel. He casted the fly one time and landed a 5 lb char. The fly now is inside the frame of a large fishing print with a brass plate inscribed: "One cast, one catch!" Spoken like a true Marine who used to go ugly early.

From: halvor ;)   Link
Submitted January 14th 2009

im just 14 years old and i come from Norway.
i got very interested in fly's.
hawe som of you some names on som flyes i could make ?

From: Walleye Whacker · julesr_23·at·  Link
Submitted April 17th 2008

Been tying crappy looking flies for years! I guess I really have something! All kidding aside, I actually take a piece of Velcro and rub it against any fly that i'm about to use just to rough it up a bit -guaranteed 50% more hits and landed fish. I've always found that the flies that resemble what it is that they are supposed to imitate work much better than flies which look exactly like what they're imitating.
Cheers- Keep it up!

From: Pete Collin · pcollin·at·  Link
Submitted April 13th 2008

I laughed when I saw this page. Years ago a friend and I were tying what we called "Hammered Mess" flies - ones intended to be as ugly as possible and still be recognizeable. We concluded that you had to actually be a good tier to make them as bad as we did, because you had to know every mistake and intentionally make them. What a treat to see something similar years later online!

From: Billy Gouin · billyzcountrygirl·at·  Link
Submitted January 4th 2008

I've tied some ugly flies before. wow those are in an exeptional class ! your rite all they look good for is the hooks !!!!!!!!!!

From: R.D.D. · blclandscape·at·  Link
Submitted December 31st 2007

these will catch a nice fish within a few casts on the right river so give it a try but you won't catch me fishin like that!

From: walt leininger · waltleininger·at·  Link
Submitted December 29th 2007

i have to agree these flies remind me of when i started tying them myself. but as my wife says, a fish don't know from ugly. as long as it works who are we to judge. we are trying to catch the fish not impress them with our tying ability.

From: Runarsson · n.runarsson·at·  Link
Submitted December 24th 2007

They would probably catch a fish... but considering the choice of thread, the odds of it coming up to two or even three seems poor.

Very nice article. Certainly nicer than those flies...

GFF staff comment
From: Martin Joergensen · martin·at·  Link
Submitted November 27th 2007


I actually never reach for the chewed up fly!

I tie the flies as they are supposed to look. If it's supposed to look chewed up, I tie it chewed up. Velcro and brushes can do that. I cannot expect fish to finish the job for me - what if I don't catch any? Then my fly will keep on looking new and inedible.
And I always prefer a newly and neatly tied fly the the one that's badly tied or banged up.

But that might just be me...


From: doug · doug·at·  Link
Submitted November 27th 2007

Rough they may be, will they catch fish? Certainly! Will they win awards for the tyer? NO way! How often do you reach for the fly that has been chewed up by many fish as you know it catches fish? I like nice clean lines on my flies too, but the fish arent trying to catch us on those flies, its the other way about.

From: LB  Link
Submitted November 21st 2007

My (late) grandfather had a friend who chewed on his (I am assuming wet) flies before using them. He swore by it, and he caught a lot of fish.

GFF staff comment
From: Martin Joergensen · martin·at·  Link
Submitted November 17th 2007

Tom and others,

I'm sure these flies could catch fish. I have seen fish caught on the strangest contraptions... even made a couple myself. One of my favorites is from the spinning world where an angler pulled his line through a carrot and tied a hook to it. He caught trout on that!

But these flies are so poorly made that I'm almost sure they would fall (more) apart within a few casts. Plus they're not nice to look at. The fish may not care, but I do.


From: Tom · th.mac.2006·at·  Link
Submitted November 17th 2007

Hi Martin:
I had to laugh when I read your article. You're right, of course.
However, under the right circumstances a salmon might actually take a nibble at one of these monsters.
I think that Lee Wulff in one of his articles wrote about some flies that his son had tied. They appeared to be rather crude in Wulff's eyes. Yet, they caught fish.
You never know !
Anyhow, thanks for this hilarious article.

From: Brian · brian_elward·at·  Link
Submitted November 17th 2007

Although they are hooks, they are pretty Pointless!

From: captain brian moran · featherbayflyfishing·at·  Link
Submitted November 16th 2007

eh gads, it certainly would make a fellow think twice about a mail order bride.

Comment to an image
From: Rich Johnson · purnellphoto·at·  Link
Submitted March 20th 2009

Just had to comment - I don't think this is a Blue Charm.
If I had to guess (without being able to see much of the body), I'd say that this is a reduced hairwing version of a Jock Scott on a small double hook. (It's not uncommon for patterns to be reduced for use on small hook used for actual fishing as opposed to display.)
A Blue Charm would have a black body with silver rib and a gray squirrel wing.

Comment to an image
From: Stephen · stephen33·at·  Link
Submitted March 11th 2009

Are these the new cripples?

Comment to an image
From: Andreas · niinmita·at·  Link
Submitted January 23rd 2009

Fladen is know for the bad quality. I have sold fladens lures and rods on my previous work and i can't believe how bad the quality is, sure they are cheap and all but i think that they should try to work on the quality.

Sorry if my english sucks :P

Comment to an image
From: rybolov · rybolov·at·  Link
Submitted January 16th 2009

It's like a lineup of criminals in the movies. =)

Want to comment this page? Fill out the form below.
Only comments
in English
are accepted!

Comentarios en Ingles
solamente, por favor!

Your name Your email
Anonymize my information. Name and email will not be shown with comment.
Notify me on new comments to this article on the above email-address.
You don't have to comment to start or stop notifications.

All comments will be screened by the GFF staff before publication.
No HTML, images, ads or links, please - we do not publish such comments...
And only English language comments will be published.
Name and email is optional but recommended.
The email will be shown in a disguised form in the final comment to protect you against spam
You can see other public comments on this page