Recent comments
Thanks Bob, I've been looking for those snaps as well.. I have only had one fail, and luckily it happend when swaping flies. They work well for swapping quickly between big warm water flies... But no wouldn't make much sense for fishing with smaller flies.
- Log in to post comments
I also gave it an "Excellent", though I'm no photographer nor art-critic. Seems to me the brilliance of this kind of photo is 'seeing' a picture in a natural setting or happening. I don't want to start a big hoo-hah, but I think the criticism is out of place in this sort of (fishing) website, and I don't want to read it.
- Log in to post comments
Man, my hand is shaking for getting in this box, touching and checking out your cool fly seletction. The photo, compositionwise might have been better of if you have eliminated the fly reel in the background. Also try to focus on the very first row of flies. It looks better if the first row is sharp and then gradually less sharp. I'd say about 3, Mats dude!
- Log in to post comments
Looking at this picture, iôm wondering what gives the "most aspects are really good" character.
Is there something hidden i cant see ?
- Log in to post comments
If this could be a lesson for all fish portraits, water dripping from the fish suggests the pic was shot immediately upon lifting the fish out of the water. Mo-mo of this! You get 5, Juan dude!
- Log in to post comments
Randon,
While we sure appreciate you comments and ratings to the pictures posted here, please notice that it is the photography we rate - not the fishing ethics.
In the above case I fail to see how the fact that the fly line is loosely draped around the fish' tail can in any way earn this in all ways fine picture a rating of "Not good - This is a bad picture - technically and content wise". It is sharp, well exposed, nicely presented and contains a live fish, which is definitely about to be released. What's the problem with that? My personal rating is a 5 - "A great image in all respects".
Martin
- Log in to post comments
Hmm, in the golden spot I can see you just managed to strangulate the fish by its tail. 1 to you, dude!
- Log in to post comments
Thanks, Paul,
I did find them at Bass Pro and they are called No-Knot Fas-Snaps. To all of the purists out there, I have been tying tiny knots for almost fifty years and these little things are great. I am a purist, too, but believe me, these little buggers are not cheating or giving in to hype in any way. I have no intention of using them with a size twenty dry fly but for big streamers and my world famous crayfish flies I wil use them forever. They wont make a bit of difference in appearance or presentation but will reduce my profanities. Yesterday I was changing flies in a 38 degree wind with a light mist. Numb finger tips and foggy glasses are not conducive conditions to tying tiny knots.
- Log in to post comments
Hi Randon.
I definately have to agree with Martin on this one. Try and ask yourself: am I really looking at the image when I find myself counting the leaves (sheeps?) or am I just surfing by hoping to find something spectacular?
I really like the graphical style of the picture.
I think that great photography is: When you find a very common motif and portray it, in a way that makes it look constructed ( in other words you put your "signature" on the picture). And then when you look at the printed image, and in the beginning the picture looks too good to be true. But then you realize that the whole thing is actually just that common situation, it just looked too good to be true.
- Log in to post comments
Murray,
The answer is a yes and a no. The fly is pretty robust and will take a lot of trashing, but the thin tinsel will eventually be cut by the pike's teeth. I have more than once seen strips of tinsel float away from a hooked fish, but the fly was still usable afterwards.
But remember how easy this fly is to tie, so just tie a few extra.
Martin
Randon,
I think you're a bit unfair there. I think it's a very nice picture that shows one of these little details that we tend to overlook. This one is even technically very well done with sharpness and a lot of texture and reflections. I like such pictures and have already given it an "Excellent".
Martin
- Log in to post comments
Hi Randon.
The photo in its real raw image is in fact quite bad, this was the best i could get out of it.
But youre right about the crop, it could be better.
will try harder next time :-)
regards Allan
- Log in to post comments
Hi Ripley.
Masking pictures in photoshop, put ontop of each other and then erase on the top picture...
Regards Allan
- Log in to post comments
Hello: I am going to try this tinsel fly this spring. It is light easy to tie. Does it stand up to the pikes teeth? It's worth trying. Lots of pike here in Northern Ontario. Murray
You just never miss a macroshot with a Nikon, do you! Nice detail, but not very fishing related. 2 to you, dude!
- Log in to post comments
Nice little creek. Seriously, what is the motive? It's a photo with a lot of disturbance. 2 to go fo you, dude!
- Log in to post comments
Oh, man this is boring. I can count 22 light leaves and 14 dark leaves. That is 34 leaves total. I'll leave you with 2.
- Log in to post comments
This is a great source of information. It is my 'go-to' for teaching about leaders.
Thank you
- Log in to post comments
Angela,
Rod should be available on rodsutterby@beeb.net - that is the address I have used to reach him.
Martin
- Log in to post comments
Hi
Trying to send an email to Rod Sutterby can you confirm his email please
- Log in to post comments
How is that effect done? B&W and the logo in colour?
Stupid question?
Rip
- Log in to post comments
I have caught so many sea trout on this pattern over the years especially in spring.
It's a pattern I am confident in using.
No matter the quarry, by adjusting the size, I am sure it would work on all species.
Rip
- Log in to post comments